Doherty v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
500 F.2d 540 · 1974
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2004
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 19 U.S.C. § 1595A (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1604 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1618 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 26 U.S.C. § 4411 · 26 U.S.C. § 7302 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Carroll v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Bolling v. Sharpe · Reed v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a regulatory and remedial complement to . . . criminal sanctions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.