Hupp v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
500 F.2d 993 · 1974
Citation profile
52 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Armstrong v. McAlpin (1983), Cook v. Avien, Inc. (1978)
52 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Bailey Assignee v. Glover et al. · Malone v. Bowdoin · Johns Hopkins University v. Hutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i)t is well established that a plaintiff may not merely rely on his own unawareness of the facts or law to toll the statute.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At the very least, these circumstances should have aroused suspicion or curiosity on the part of plaintiff.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“While the existence of a fiduciary relationship is, no doubt, one factor which a court should consider in determining whether a plaintiff has exercised due diligence, a mere allegation that such a relationship existed is alone not necessarily determinative. A court should also consider other factors, including the nature of the fraud alleged, the opportunity to discover the fraud and the subsequent actions of defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.