Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 F.3d 130 - Butt v. Gonzales

Butt v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

500 F.3d 130 · 2007

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
February 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2021

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

70200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Jacobson · Ci Pan v. United States Attorney General · Lendo v. Gonzales · Hadayat v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The process through which an alien pursues employment-based adjustment of status is as follows: First, the aliens prospective employer must file an application for a labor certification. If the Department of Labor certifies the application, the alien’s prospective employer must then file a Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, accompanied by the Labor Certification. If the Petition is approved, the alien, who must be residing in the U.S., must file a Form I-485 Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] visa petition is meritorious in fact for purposes of grandfathering under 8 C.F.R. § 1245.10 if, based on the circumstances that existed at the time the petition was filed, the beneficiary of the petition qualified for the requested classification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “requir[e] that, based on the facts as they exist at the time of filing, the application should be granted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.