Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 F.3d 1346 - In re Nuijten

In re Nuijten’s Empirical Analysis

500 F.3d 1346 · 2007

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably In re Bilski (2008), SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission (2010)

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

210200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 100 · 35 U.S.C. § 101 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 171

Relies on Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji · Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross · Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. · Diamond v. Diehr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a claim covers material not found in any of the four statutory categories, that claim falls outside the plainly expressed scope of § 101 even if the subject matter is otherwise new and useful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is a matter of both claim construction and statutory construction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Claim construction is a question of law ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.