Booze v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 4201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Lambert v. Warden · Vorbleski v. Commissioner · Toomey v. Young · Toomey v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any alleged parole violator summoned or retaken under section 4213 shall be accorded the opportunity to have--(A) a preliminary hearing ... to determine if there is probable cause to believe that he has violated a condition of his parole”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To the extent that this regulation would permit the issuance of a mandatory release violator warrant after the supervision period ... respondent has cited no statutory authority for it and, therefore, the Court declines to follow it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Joiner v. Henman“[c]onviction for a Federal, State, or local crime committed subsequent to release on parole shall constitute probable cause for purposes of [18 U.S.C. Sec. 4214(a) ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.