500 F. Supp. 2d 618 - Florance v. Buchmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “are conclusory and devoid of any specific facts to support an allegation that an agreement existed between CI, Attorney, and Ex-husband and the state actor defendants to commit an illegal act. Accordingly, Plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege that these defendants conspired with a state actor, and her § 1983 claims against them should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. C. 42 U.S.C. § 1985 CI moves to dismiss Plaintiff's § 1985 claim for failure to assert that his actions were motivated by”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Thomas v. State

2. “Mireles v. Waco , 502 U.S. 9 , 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286 , 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) ; Stump v. Sparkman , 435 U.S. 349 , 356-357, 98 S.Ct. 1099 , 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978) ; Young v. Biggers , 938 F.2d 565 , 569 n.5 (5th Cir. 1991). Allegations of bad faith or malice do not overcome judicial immunity. Mireles , 502 U.S. at 11 , 112 S.Ct. 286 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Blakely v. Andrade

3. “any statement made by the judge, jurors, counsel, parties or witnesses, and attaches to all aspects of the proceedings, including statements made in open court, pre-trial hearings, depositions, affidavits and any of the pleadings or other papers in the case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Thomas v. State