Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 P.2d 68 - Deeter v. State

Deeter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably Vigil v. State (1996), Oldham v. State (1975)

29 state decisions

140197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Terminal Freight Handling Co. v. Solien · Alcala v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘There is not one single thing in this case that you have to weigh in your mind as to “is he telling the truth,” or “isn’t he telling the truth”; or “which one is right,” and “which one is wrong?” ’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"... [A]ffidavits of probable cause for search are to be tested by much less rigorous standards than those governing admissibility of evidence at the trial and issuing magistrates are not to be confined by niggardly limitations, Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 419 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , ..."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““There is not one single thing * * * that you have to weigh in your mind as to ‘is he telling the truth,’ * * * or ‘which one is right,’ * * *. There’s none of that in this case because there are only two witnesses. The state of Wyoming called those two witnesses * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.