Townsend v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 368 So. 2d 310 - Perry v. State · 497 So. 2d 194 - Matkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Following the court’s oral charge to the jury, defense counsel objected to the court’s failure to charge the jury on the appellant’s right not to testify in the case. This oral exception was sufficient to preserve error under Rule 14, A.R.Cr. P.Temp., even though defense counsel did not submit a written charge covering the matter of the appellant’s failure to so testify. See Matkins v. State, 497 So.2d 194 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). “The trial court committed reversible error by refusing defense counsel’s request to charge the jury on the effect of the appellant’s failure to testify. Perry v. State, 368 So.2d 310 (Ala.1979).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wolfe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.