500 So. 2d 1280 - Webb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2015
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bumper v. North Carolina · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the person detained of criminal activity,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hether a consent to a search was in fact `voluntary' or was the product of coercion, express or implied, is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is engaged in some type of criminal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Odom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.