500 So. 2d 262 - Austin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2008
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Heiney v. Florida · LeDuc v. Florida · 365 So. 2d 704 - Smith v. State · United States v. Montes-Cardenas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“testimony would have been greatly diminished if he had been prevented from testifying as to why he and Austin were together when they discovered the victim in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Among the purposes for which a collateral crime may be admitted is establishment of the entire context out of which the criminal action occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cast light on the character of the crimes for which Austin was prosecuted,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.