500 So. 2d 382 - State v. Pierre’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably State v. Smith (2000), 679 So. 2d 1324 - State v. Sandifer (1996)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 425 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Telsee · 448 So. 2d 645 - State v. Davis · 428 So. 2d 468 - State v. Guajardo · 439 So. 2d 377 - State v. Union Tank Car Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given a genuine construction, according to the fair import of their words, taken in their usual sense, in connection with the context, and with reference to the purpose of the provision.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Walker · State v. Hair“he acts with intent. Thus, the criminal intent required by the statute is implicit in the word”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. It shall be unlawful for any person to produce, manufacture, distribute, or dispense any substance which is represented to be a controlled dangerous substance and which is an imitation controlled dangerous substance, or any controlled dangerous substance which is a counterfeit controlled dangerous substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.