500 So. 2d 657 - State v. Weitz’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2009
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 495 So. 2d 1170 - State v. Palmore · State v. McPhadder · 378 So. 2d 1240 - State v. Segura
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it is true that knowledge that a defendant had ingested illegal drugs may prejudice some prospective jurors, it is quite another matter to say that because of such possible bias no juror in a trial for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs may hear that the defendant had ingested drugs prior to the incident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The extent of that influence is a separate element, provable by other evidence, including the observations of the police officers and the fact that appellee caused the accident.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tagner · State v. Sercey“appear to virtually eliminate the possibility of a conviction for DUI/controlled substances in his court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.