Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 So. 2d 713 - Vileenor v. State

500 So. 2d 713 - Vileenor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2008

4 state decisions

20198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Mempa v. Rhay · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [defendant] has a right to counsel at every critical stage of the proceedings. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), Anderson v. State, 420 So.2d 574 (Fla. 1982). The right to counsel is a fundamental right, Gordon v. State, 469 So.2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 480 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1985), and the alleged denial of such a right need not be preserved by objection. Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fruetel v. State
  2. “It therefore appears that the per se rule is limited to factual situations involving additional jury instructions or answers to jury questions about testimony or evidence where no notice has been given under rule 3.410.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fruetel v. State
  3. “the reviewing court must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 764 So. 2d 813 - Wilson v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.