Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 So. 2d 873 - State v. Dupre

500 So. 2d 873 - State v. Dupre’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Metcalf v. State (1993), State v. Hayes (1996)

32 state decisions

1601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Benjamin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, when an attorney is appointed as an advisor the accused must knowingly abandon his right to be represented by counsel.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is clear that Faretta cannot, and does not, contemplate that the propriety of granting a defendant the right to represent himself shall be judged by what happens in the subsequent course of that representation. It is the record made in recognizing that right that is determinative. See United States v. Bailey, 675 F.2d 1292 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 459 U.S. 853 , 103 S.Ct. 119 , 74 L.Ed.2d 104 (1982). Furthermore, the state has the burden of establishing that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel. State v. Brooks, 452 So.2d 149 (La.1984).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although a defendant need not himself have the skill and experience of a lawyer in order competently and intelligently to choose self-representation, he should be made aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so that the record will establish that "he knows what he is doing and his choice is made with eyes open."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.