Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 500 U.S. 13 - In Re Amendment to Rule 39

In Re Amendment to Rule 39’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2015 · most notably Florida v. Bostick (1991), United States v. Sims (1992)

13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

150199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on in Re Jessie McDonald · In Re Michael Sindram · In Re Demos · Wade v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “39.8 If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ, as the case may be, is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “And with each barrier that it places in the way of indigent litigants, . . . the Court can only reinforce in the hearts and minds of our society's less fortunate members the unsettling message that their pleas are not welcome here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[i]t is vital that the right to file in forma pauperis not be incumbered by those who would abuse the integrity of our process by frivolous filings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.