Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 A2D 803 - State v. Walls

State v. Walls’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2022

1 district · 15 state decisions

6019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[knew] what he [was] doing and his choice [was] made with eyes open.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether an accused has properly waived his right to counsel must be determined by the trial court based on the particular facts and circumstances of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in the light most favorable to the court's ruling to determine whether the record will support a finding of a knowing and intelligent waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.