In re Killmer’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Kalb v. Feuerstein · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Schwartz v. United States · Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Bidermann · Robert Gruntz Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The situation that is alleged to have occurred here is the type of scenario that Congress intended to prevent. Since the automatic stay is meant to prevent creditors from racing to the courthouse to the detriment of other creditors, the Court sees no reason why a creditor who has been harmed by a stay violation should not be able to seek redress for its injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.