Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 B.R. 409 - In re Knowles

In re Knowles’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 507 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States · United States v. Estus · Hamilton v. Lanning · Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A. · Flygare v. Boulden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... nondischargeability is not, and does not entail, priority as to any distribution in or through bankruptcy; it merely permits the. holder to continue to enforce the debt after bankruptcy ..., Accordingly, as far as the Code is concerned, nothing in the nature of the claims at issue here warrants or justifies treating student loans-more favorably than the others. 133”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) whether the discrimination has a reasonable basis; (2) whether the debtor can carry out a plan without the discrimination; (3) whether the discrimination is proposed in good faith; and (4) whether the degree of discrimination is directly related to the basis or rationale for the discrimination. 4”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) equality of distribution; (2) nonpriority of student loans; (3) mandatory versus optional contributions (a comparison of what the dischargeable unsecured creditors would receive in a pro rata distribution of the mandatory contribution under chapter 13); and (4) the debtor's fresh start.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.