Manning v. Jarnigan’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.2d 408 · 1974
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably United States v. Pope (1977), United States v. McCaleb (1977)
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As this court stated in Manning v. Jarni-gan, 501 F.2d 408 (6th Cir. 1974), “[t]he difference between an investigatory stop and an arrest has yet to be spelled out. [However], this was clearly a deprivation of liberty under the authority of law. It does not take formal words of arrest or booking at a police station to complete an arrest.” 501 F.2d at 410 . When appellants were taken to the private office and were not free to leave, the arrest was clearly complete. See, United States v. Jackson, 533 F.2d 314 (6th Cir. 1976). United States v. McCaleb, supra at 720 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Was the petitioner Mr. Manning free to leave at any time prior to the search after the police officer flashed his spotlight on Mr. Manning’s car? (2) Was Mr. Manning’s consent to search his automobile freely and voluntarily given? (3) Did Mr. Manning know at the time of the search that he did not have to agree to a search?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Manning v. Jarnigan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.