United States v. Dilts’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.2d 531 · 1974
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably United States v. Calabrese (1981), United States v. Sayan (1992)
22 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · Bell v. United States · Quercia v. United States · Gordon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have previously felt compelled to criticize this Assistant United States Attorney for departing from the record. [See United States v. Hernandez, 486 F.2d 614 , 618 (7th Cir. 1973).] In view of this history, we have considered the need for an exercise of our supervisory power as a deterrent to deliberate prosecutorial misconduct. Cf., United States v. Tru-tenko, 490 F.2d 678 , 681 (7th Cir. 1973). We have concluded, however, that since the flagrant misconduct occurred before us, rather than in the trial court, these judgments should not be reversed.” (At 8, footnotes omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If all of the instruments had been negotiated at the same time and place, it would be reasonable to infer that only one transportation would ensue and, therefore, that only one offense was committed. On the facts disclosed by this record, however, we hold that since the indictment alleged eight separate instances of negotiating forged securities, it alleged eight separate violations of § 2314.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'happenstance of bank transmission procedure[.]'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.