Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 F.2d 585 - Kersh v. Bounds

Kersh v. Bounds’s Empirical Analysis

501 F.2d 585 · 1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2003

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

701974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Blackledge v. Perry · Johnson v. Avery · Ross v. Moffitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ince the county prisoners are treated alike and the Department prisoners are treated alike, ... there is no equal protection violation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.