Gresham v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.2d 687 · 1974
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc. (1981), Jenkins v. Blue Cross Mutual Hospital Insurance (1976)
46 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Bell v. Hood · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · City of Kenosha v. Bruno · United States v. Borden Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . upon a clear showing of either (1) probable success on the merits and possible irreparable injury, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where a pattern of past discrimination appears, recruitment procedures that might otherwise be classified as neutral will no longer be accepted as non-discriminatory. Additional methods must then be devised to compensate for the effects of past discriminatory practices and to guard against their perpetuation or recurrence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although the [jurisdictional issue] was not raised by the appellees, we are duty bound to consider it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.