Hoyle v. Ada County’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.3d 1053 · 2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Green v. United States · Sumner v. Mata · United States v. Jorn · United States v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“28 U.S.C. § 2241 ... empowers district courts to provide habeas relief on pretrial double jeopardy challenges ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Gouveia v. Espinda
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.