Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 F.3d 297 - Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.

Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

501 F.3d 297 · 2007

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMC (2010), Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc. (2010)

14 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions

530200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 13 (§ 2 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 14 (§ 3 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 18 (§ 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 4 (§ 4 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 4302 (Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “significant market share coupled with anticompetitive practices, barriers to entry, the strength of competition, the probable development of the industry, and the elasticity of consumer demand”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “regulatory requirements, high capital costs, or technological obstacles[ ] that prevent new competition from entering a market.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “typically should not resolve this question at the pleading stage 'unless it is clear on the face of the complaint that the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.