Laney v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.3d 577 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · Goss v. Lopez · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Arnett v. Kennedy · Radvansky v. City of Olmsted Falls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a student should be given oral or written notice of the charges against him, and if he denies them, an explanation of the evidence the authorities have and an opportunity to present his side of the story.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“so isolates a student from educational opportunities that it infringes her property interest in an education”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.