Thompson v. Veach’s Empirical Analysis
501 F.3d 832 · 2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2020
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Meachum v. Fano · Board of Pardons v. Allen · Solomon v. Elsea · Blair-Bey v. Quick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the administrative findings of fact to determine whether there is a rational basis in the record for the [Parole Commission's] conclusions embodied in its statement of reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.