501 F. Supp. 1237 - Stanger v. Ambach’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · McKart v. United States · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. · Concerned Parents & Citizens for Continuing Education v. New York City Board of Education · Diapulse Corp. of America v. Food & Drug Administration of the Department of Health, Education & Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A disruption of [these] lives, such as that which would be caused by an abrupt change of [facilities], would be likely so to disturb these [individuals] that many skills, acquired after time and great effort, would become unlearned and lost. Many have been transferred before; shuttled from pillar to post ... At least during the pen-dency of this lawsuit, such irreparable injury ... must be avoided.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any matter relating to ... the provision of a free appropriate public education”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fallis v. Ambach“Standards for Activities Reimbursable for State Aid Purposes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fallis v. Ambach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.