Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 NE2D 1058 - Poore v. State

Poore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2011

8 state decisions

501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. State · Funk v. State · Gaunt v. State · Arnold v. State · Emmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant's conviction rested in a substantial way on the testimony of Goodwin, a barely credible witness. On a matter so critical as this, the trial court should have allowed the presentation of this evidence. Considering the importance of the evidence defendant wished to present and its possible impact on the jury's determination, the court abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “merely because of the passage of time or possibly through the pressures and excitement of testifying inadvertently omitted certain crucial facts, the State would be well within its right to use the witness' prior statement to refresh his recollection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reversal should be granted when the trial court's exercise of discretion was 'unreasonable in light of all attendant cireum-stances' and prejudicial to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.