Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 N.E.2d 439 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2009

8 state decisions

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mutual Life Ins Co of New York v. Hillmon · Taylor v. United States · Bonanno v. United States · Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. FIELDS · Howard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is that the defendant must be personally present at every critical state of the proceeding unless he knowingly and voluntarily waives that right. The continued absence of a defendant who knows of his obligation to be in court, when coupled with a failure to notify the court and provide it with an explanation, constitutes a knowing and voluntary waiver. Here, the record reveals that the appellant was personally advised of the trial date. He did not notify the trial court nor provide it with an explanation of his absence. Consequently, he knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to be present at trial, (citations omitted) (emphasis added)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “check with [the defendant] to see if it was available,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.