Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 P2D 1017 - Aimonetto v. Keepes

Aimonetto v. Keepes’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
14
states following
November 1999
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 1999 · most notably 175 Ind. App. 150 - Hall v. Owen County State Bank (1977), Clark Leasing Corp. v. White Sands Forest Products, Inc. (1975)

4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions — followed in 14 states

140197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skeels v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · 6 Wash. App. 866 - Grant County Tractor Co. v. Nuss · 66 Misc. 2d 1089 - Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp. v. Atlas Shirt Co. · Wright v. Conway · 222 F. Supp. 696 - Skeels v. Universal CIT Credit Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * [W]e are persuaded that one general principle upon which plaintiffs rely is applicable here, that is, compliance with § 34-9-504(3) is a condition precedent to recovery of any deficiency between sale price of collateral and the amount of the unpaid balance.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “commercial code provides that the rule in regard to notice may not be waived or varied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.