Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 P2D 1360 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably McClain v. State (1974), Lauderdale v. State (1976)

42 state decisions

130197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Ex Parte Barber · Campbell v. United States · Dombrowski v. Pfister

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where no evidence indicating otherwise is produced, the presumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers, and courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Prior Inconsistent Statement. A witness may be impeached by evidence that he has made at other times statements inconsistent with his present testimony. The statements must first be related to him, with the circumstances of times, places, and persons present, and the witness shall be asked whether he has made such statements and, if so, shall be allowed to explain them. If the statements are in writing, they shall be shown to the witness before he is asked any question concerning them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “However, if the notes in question were destroyed in good faith, without the intent to avoid production, it is the general rule that their destruction is not a ground for reversal. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.