Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 P2D 208 - In Re Metcalf

In Re Metcalf’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2003

6 state decisions

301972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Appeal of Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial court erred in the present case in admitting evidence concerning hardship which might result, in the future, from the suspension of Metcalf’s driver’s license. It follows that this court may not consider that evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.