Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 SO2D 318 - Schnatz v. Schnatz

Schnatz v. Schnatz’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2016

16 state decisions

701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 442 So. 2d 506 - Fouchi v. Fouchi · State v. Danos · 442 So. 2d 522 - Pickering v. City of Baton Rouge · 490 So. 2d 390 - Guice v. Mustakas · 352 So. 2d 1301 - Millet v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The appellate court shall render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal. The court may award damages for frivolous appeal; and may tax the costs of the lower or appellate court, or any part thereof, against any party to the suit, as in its judgment may be considered equitable."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that does not determine the merits but only preliminary matters in the course of the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a judgment that determines the merits in whole or in part,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.