Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 SO2D 424 - Peoples v. State

Peoples v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2018

23 state decisions

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 473 So. 2d 952 - Gavin v. State · 278 So. 2d 384 - Glass v. State · 487 So. 2d 1304 - Gray v. State · 486 So. 2d 360 - Malone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a combination of two or more persons to accomplish an unlawful purpose or to accomplish a lawful purpose unlawfully, the persons agreeing in order to form the conspiracy. The offense is complete without showing an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The agreement need not be formal or express, but may be inferred from the circumstances, particularly by declarations, acts and conduct of the alleged conspirators.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “recognition on the part of the conspirators that they are entering into a common plan and knowingly intend to further its common purpose.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.