Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 So. 2d 591 - Lee v. State

501 So. 2d 591 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
9
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Matson (2003), 657 So. 2d 1146 - Angrand v. Key (1995)

27 state decisions

11019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · 484 So. 2d 6 - Florida Bar v. Goodman · 462 So. 2d 1082 - State v. Glosson · Trushin v. State · Wood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[OJnce a plea bargain based on a prosecutor’s promise that the state will recommend a certain sentence is struck, basic fairness mandates that no agent of the state make any utterance that would tend to compromise the effectiveness of the state’s recommendation.... [I]t matters not whether the recommendation contrary to the agreement is made in open court or whether, as here, it is contained in a PSI report.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[O]nce a plea bargain based on a prosecutor's promise that the state will recommend a certain sentence is struck, basic fairness mandates that no agent of the state make any utterance that would tend to compromise the effectiveness of the state's recommendation. ... [I]t matters not whether the recommendation contrary to the agreement is made in open court or whether, as here, it is contained in a PSI report. "The crucial factor is that a recommendation contrary to the state's agreement came to the sentencing court's attention." [ Fortini v. State, 472 So.2d 1383, 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 484 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1986)]. Regardless of how a recommendation counter to that bargained for is communicated to the trial court, once the court is apprised of this inconsistent position, the persuasive effect of the bargained for recommendation is lost.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[W]hether a promise contained in a plea agreement that the "state" will recommend a given sentence binds only the state attorney's office or whether it also precludes other state agents, such as state law enforcement officers, from making sentencing recommendations contrary to the terms of the agreements.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.