501 So. 2d 665 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 498 So. 2d 1249 - Casteel v. State · 469 So. 2d 128 - Weems v. State · Swain v. State · 484 So. 2d 71 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS THE TRIAL COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT DEFENDANT IS A CONTINUING THREAT TO THE COMMUNITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE TEMPORAL PROXIMITY OF COMMISSION OF THE CRIME EVINCES A TOTAL DISREGARD OF THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OTHERS A VALID AND SUFFICIENT GROUND FOR DEPARTING FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1) the defendant's extensive juvenile record; and 2) [the defendant is] a continuing threat to the community due to the fact that the temporal proximity of the commission of the crimes evinces a total disregard of the property rights of others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the record before us does not clearly and convincingly support such a contention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.