501 So. 2d 689 - Casby v. Flint’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1988
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 75 - Schoen v. Gilbert · 462 So. 2d 90 - Viksne v. Viksne · 479 So. 2d 831 - NW FLA. CRIPPLED v. Harigel · 490 So. 2d 252 - Krivanek v. Pasternack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where plaintiff slips, falls, and is injured because of a difference in floor levels, is an allegation that the difference was obscured either by (1) other social guests, or (2) by an excessive number of other social guests sufficient as an allegation of an inherently dangerous condition giving rise to a duty to warn, thus being distinguishable from Schoen v. Gilbert, 436 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1983)?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause a difference in floor levels is not an inherently dangerous condition, even in dim lighting, a homeowner has no duty to warn of such condition as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.