Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 SO2D 834 - State v. Rousell

State v. Rousell’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Sepulvado · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · 425 So. 2d 1251 - State v. Telsee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for a defendant to succeed in the suppression of an identification, resulting from a photographic lineup, he must prove, both, that the identification procedure was suggestive and that there exists a likelihood of misidentification as a result of the identification procedure. State v. Prudholm, 446 So.2d 729 (La., 1984) citing, Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.