Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 So. 2d 962 - State v. Mims

501 So. 2d 962 - State v. Mims’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2014

19 state decisions

1401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · 459 So. 2d 31 - State v. Richardson · 431 So. 2d 854 - State v. Cunningham · 360 So. 2d 842 - State v. Jackson · 443 So. 2d 1098 - State v. Trosclair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude that the prejudicial effect of such testimony outweighs its probative value because of the substantial risk that the potential persuasive appearance of the expert witness will have a greater influence on the jury than the other evidence presented during the trial. Such testimony invades the province of the jury and usurps its function. We therefore conclude that the trial court did not abuse his discretion in failing to allow the expert witness to testify. The testimony sought to be elicited from him would not have been an aid to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime, the witness' [sic] degree of attention, the accuracy of his prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated at the confrontation, and the time between the crime and the confrontation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.