Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 SW2D 39 - State v. Morris

State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · Smith v. Hooey · Beavers v. Haubert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but only that he was required to so recall after the delay. He did not testify at his trial, but he did offer two witnesses who testified that he was at a place other than the Gateway National Bank of St. Louis at the time of the robbery. 22 State v. Morris, supra, 501 S.W.2d at 41. 23 We conclude that Morris was not prejudiced by the delay and that this factor must, therefore, be weighed heavily against him. 24 In Barker the Court stressed that none of the four factors has”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.