Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 501 SW2D 639 - Monroe v. State

Monroe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 89 Tex. Crim. 345 - Lewis v. State · Brazile v. State · McGee v. State · Bryant v. State · 132 Tex. Crim. 261 - Elsmore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) A person commits an offense if he causes the death of an individual under circumstances that would constitute murder under Section 19.02 of this code, except that he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause. (b) ‘Sudden passion’ means passion directly caused by and arising out of provocation by the individual killed or another acting with the person killed which passion arises at the time of the offense and is not solely the résult of former provocation. (c) ‘Adequate cause’ means cause that would commonly produce a degree of anger, rage, resentment, or terror in a person of ordinary temper, sufficient to render the mind incapable of cool reflection.” 6”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is immaterial if the theory of voluntary manslaughter was raised by appellant’s own testimony or if the case is doubtful. As was the rule in murder without malice cases under Article 1257c of the former Penal Code, once the issue is raised by the evidence, the trial court, without determining the weight or the truth or falsity of the testimony, is bound to submit the issue for determination by the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.