Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 A2D 454 - In Re McConnell

In Re McConnell’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Matter of Colson · Matter of Kent · Matter of Kerr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did willfully attempt to evade and defeat a large part of the income tax due and owing fay him to the United States of America for the calendar years 1988, 1989, and 1990, by preparing and causing to be prepared, and by signing and causing to be signed, false'and fraudulent U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns-” According to the information, “his taxable income for the said calendar years was substantially in excess” of what he had reported on his tax returns, so that "a substantial additional tax was due and owing to the United States of America.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the essential elements of the crime of which [McConnell] was charged were ‘knowingly’ and ‘wilfully’ preparing a false and fraudulent income tax return for the purpose of defrauding the United States Government,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.