Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 F.2d 375 - Mitchell v. Sirica

Mitchell v. Sirica’s Empirical Analysis

502 F.2d 375 · 1974

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Patrick (1976)

22 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

26019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We were concerned that disqualifying judges for bias developed during the very trial in which disqualification is sought would cripple the courts, and refused to disqualify the judge. Plainly, if such bias were sufficient, virtually every judge in every case would be disqualified and the courts abruptly would cease functioning.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding. The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and shall be filed not less than ten days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, or good cause shall be shown for failure to file it within such time. A party may file only one such affidavit in any case. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of counsel of record stating that it is made in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 144 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Any justice or judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any case in which he has a substantial interest, has been of counsel, is or has been a material witness, or is so related to or connected with any party or his attorney as to render it improper, in his opinion, for him to sit on the trial, appeal, or other proceeding therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.