New Jersey Chapter Inc. of American Physical Therapy Ass'n v. Prudential Life Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
502 F.2d 500 · 1974
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2001 · most notably Gosman v. United States (1978), Sierra Club v. Morton (1975)
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. B Camp Barlow · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Standing need not be founded on a rock; a pebble or even a cobweb may do.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a fiscal intermediary making reimbursement to providers, therefore, Prudential is bound to apply the reasonable cost standard to claims submitted by providers. In fulfillment of its obligation, and in accord with HEW’s ‘prudent buyer’ concept, Prudential issued its letter of November 23, 1971. We think this letter was a reasonable and proper attempt to outline a rational method for determining ‘reasonable costs.’ We think also that Prudential’s use of guidelines of this type is within the authority conferred by the Act and HEW’s regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.