Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 F.2d 946 - Brennan v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Brennan v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission’s Empirical Analysis

502 F.2d 946 · 1974

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably 6 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1436, 1978 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 22,646 Cornell and Company, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of Labor (1978), Frank Irey, Jr., Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission (1974)

47 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

46019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Realty & Construction Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission · Brennan v. Southern Contractors Service · Associated Industries of New York State, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “. . . a serious violation shall be deemed to exist in a place of employment if there is a substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a condition which exists, or from one or more practices, means, methods, operations, or processes which have been adopted or are in use, in such place of employment unless the employer did not, and could not with the exercise of reasonable diligence, know of the presence of the violation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Since the general duty clause is so broad, the evidence to support a charge of violation should be specific and detailed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.