Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 FSUPP 1208 - Davidson v. Harris

Davidson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2014

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Barrett v. United States · Baerga v. Richardson · James Hess, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America · Pauline Ginsburg v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [statute and] regulations dealing with repayment presuppose that there will be situations in which improper payments are received and retained and the recipient is nevertheless not at fault. Accordingly, it is clear that recipients are not always to be deemed to have knowledge of the law or to be charged with negligence for failure to know it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an administrative law judge may not reject a claimant's testimony without some evidence in the record to support this rejection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.