United States v. Jacob’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206
Relies on Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Johnson v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To uphold the validity of this warrant would negate the purposes underlying a neutral probable cause determination. While the supporting affidavit appears sufficient to permit a finding of probable cause as to the categories of items described in the warrant, and the place where they may be found, it does not establish probable cause to search for evidence of an infinite variety of federal crimes. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on its face, * * * (it) purports to authorize the search for evidence of any federal crime as long as the evidence 'relates' to the persons or transactions identified in the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.