Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 FSUPP 308 - Lawless v. Central Engineering Co.

Lawless v. Central Engineering Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Killian v. United States · Tsarnas v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Becker v. Interstate Properties · Bell v. Koppers Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This could only result in a reduction of plaintiff’s award of damages, possibly unrelated to the true proportion of liability. This thoroughly plausible result would be ironic and, this Court believes, not the result intended by the Pennsylvania Legislature. 16”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.