Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 502 FSUPP 822 - Hamilton v. Bradford

Hamilton v. Bradford’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Keys · Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Steele · Crowe v. Fotiades · Cooper v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Mississippi, agency and the scope thereof may be proved through the testimony of the agent alone.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.