Crawford v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1996
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blackburn v. State · 182 Ind. App. 156 - Roddy v. State · Commissioner of Social Services v. Klein · Jones v. State · Dorsey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On or about the 8th day of June, 1995, in St. Joseph County, State of Indiana, MICHAEL TOWNSEND knowingly distributed a substance, other than a controlled substance or a drug for which a prescription is required under federal or state law, that was expressly or impliedly represented to be a controlled substance, that was distributed under circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the substance was a controlled substance, or by overall appearance would lead a reasonable person to believe the substance was a controlled substance, to-wit: cocaine. All of which is contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, to-wit: Indiana Codes 35-38-4-4.6(a)(4) and 35-38-4^.5,....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Townsend v. State“[dJjue process requires that defendants be notified of the charges against them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Salary v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.